Players

Kurt Allen Junior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	14	15	14	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	15	.333	2	0	5	0.00	9	.444	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	5.05
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	25	.400	2	1	2	0.20	11	.818	2	0.40	2	1.000	18.0	5.38
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.05
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.02
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	14	.071	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.04
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	19	.105	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	3	.333	11.0	6.32
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	27	.519	7	1	2	0.20	19	.895	1	0.20	1	1.000	18.5	7.59
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	18	.000	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	5.84
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	0	26	.538	8	1	0	0.25	19	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	7.47
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	22	.364	8	3	2	1.00	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	8.52
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	5	37	.486	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	1	0.20	4	.250	25.5	8.19
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	21	.286	5	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	25	.480	7	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.14
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	22	.500	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.28
44	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	22	.091	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
45	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	28	.429	8	0	1	0.00	20	.950	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.34
Total		58	188	3.24	62	350	.360	69	9	32	0.16	205	.844	7	0.12	15	.467	217.0	6.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	10	2.47	15	0	1.000	7.5	5.05
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	4	0.80	15	2.13	30	2	.933	18.0	5.38
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	3	1.79	14	1	.929	10.5	5.05
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	9.5	7.02
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	13	2.23	26	0	1.000	7.5	4.04
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	8	2.22	18	1	.944	11.0	6.32
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	21	2.80	25	0	1.000	18.5	7.59
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.33	15	1	.933	10.5	5.84
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.32	19	3	.842	15.0	7.47
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.35	20	1	.950	15.5	8.52
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	10	2.39	18	0	1.000	25.5	8.19
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.15	13	1	.923	10.0	6.16
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	2.42	26	0	1.000	17.0	8.14
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	11	2.60	15	1	.933	14.5	8.28
44	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	13	2.45	20	0	1.000	9.5	6.68
45	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	13	2.00	33	2	.939	17.0	6.34
Total		58	3	34	37	2	0.64	58	1.00	181	2.32	321	13	.960	217.0	6.63