Players

Miles Greaves Junior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	13	15	13	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	21	-.095	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.55
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	13	-.077	2	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.75
4	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	24	.167	5	2	4	0.50	13	.692	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.29
5	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	9	.222	2	1	2	0.33	6	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	4.38
11	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	9	.111	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	2.71
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	18	.167	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.72
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	15	.200	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.22
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.16
18	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	15	.133	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	3	.000	8.5	4.07
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	2	1	3	0.33	7	.571	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	2.82
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	26	.308	6	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.44
26	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	22	.136	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.25	2	.500	8.0	3.51
29	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	18	.556	8	0	6	0.00	19	.684	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.35
34	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.56
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	0	18	.500	5	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	1	0.20	2	.500	10.0	3.74
Total		56	103	1.84	53	237	.211	57	9	33	0.16	164	.799	4	0.07	10	.400	130.0	3.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	12	1.85	33	7	.788	4.5	2.55
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	18	2.10	31	6	.806	7.0	3.75
4	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	11	1.83	30	5	.833	13.0	4.29
5	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	4	1.33	11	2.14	22	3	.864	7.5	4.38
11	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	8	1.73	22	4	.818	7.0	2.71
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	11	2.04	26	4	.846	9.5	5.72
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	1.71	14	2	.857	7.0	2.22
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	11	3.67	6	2.09	11	2	.818	8.0	5.16
18	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	17	2.08	38	1	.974	8.5	4.07
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	4	1.82	11	1	.909	5.5	2.82
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	17	1.95	43	4	.907	17.0	5.44
26	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	11	2.00	31	4	.871	8.0	3.51
29	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	16	1.89	36	6	.833	13.5	4.35
34	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.42	19	0	1.000	4.0	3.56
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	20	2.16	38	4	.895	10.0	3.74
Total		56	0	36	36	0	0.64	56	1.00	177	1.99	405	53	.869	130.0	3.88