Players

Roger Hudson Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	11	14	14	13	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	1.82
3	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	9	28	-.214	6	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.39
4	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	15	.200	4	1	4	0.25	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	2.65
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.06
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.80
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	10	.000	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	1	0.25	1	1.000	5.5	2.07
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	8	-.125	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.28
15	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	12	.000	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.57
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.12
21	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	27	.222	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.24
25	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	17	.118	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.20	1	1.000	8.5	3.54
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	12	2	2	0.67	19	.895	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	4.65
29	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	11	-.273	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.99
33	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.20
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	25	.200	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.33
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	24	.000	3	1	3	0.25	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.43
39	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	17	.529	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.46
41	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	17	.471	6	2	2	0.50	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	4.54
Total		65	99	1.52	62	270	.137	62	10	36	0.15	186	.806	4	0.06	7	.571	131.5	3.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	6	1.54	26	6	.769	6.0	1.82
3	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	12	1.93	30	5	.833	5.5	3.39
4	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	11	1.71	31	6	.806	8.0	2.65
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	1.85	27	5	.815	5.0	2.06
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	6	1.57	21	6	.714	0.5	1.80
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	11	1.63	48	11	.771	5.5	2.07
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	12	1.72	29	7	.759	4.0	2.28
15	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	15	1.97	31	5	.839	4.0	2.57
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	14	1.90	30	5	.833	3.5	3.12
21	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	8	1.74	27	4	.852	13.0	5.24
25	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	16	2.08	37	2	.946	8.5	3.54
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	8	1.83	23	5	.783	10.5	4.65
29	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	13	2.09	23	3	.870	3.5	3.99
33	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	13	1.84	31	6	.806	7.5	4.20
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	13	1.91	33	5	.848	11.5	4.33
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	16	2.19	31	5	.839	7.5	3.43
39	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	6	1.82	17	3	.824	13.5	6.46
41	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	14	1.90	30	7	.767	14.0	4.54
Total		65	3	39	42	2	0.65	52	0.80	206	1.85	525	96	.817	131.5	3.45