Players

Sinbad Cocoamobile Sophomore Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	16	16	14	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.68
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	15	-.200	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.60
5	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	12	.083	9	1	3	0.33	16	.813	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.48
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	6	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	2.88
11	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	4.07
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	22	.273	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.98
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	6.43
16	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.45
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	16	.188	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.31
21	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	26	.192	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.64
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.36
26	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	18	.222	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.64
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	14	.429	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.45
34	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	17	.294	8	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.60
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	20	.450	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.61
Total		50	102	2.04	47	225	.244	63	5	27	0.10	160	.831	1	0.02	3	.333	125.0	4.28

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	6	1.48	25	7	.720	2.5	2.68
3	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	12	1.63	35	8	.771	4.5	1.60
5	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	12	1.93	29	4	.862	7.0	4.48
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	3	1.70	10	1	.900	6.0	2.88
11	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.05	20	3	.850	6.0	4.07
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.27	22	1	.955	9.0	4.98
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	17	2.30	30	2	.933	9.5	6.43
16	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.12	25	1	.960	8.0	4.45
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	17	1.91	34	8	.765	7.5	3.31
21	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	16	2.11	37	3	.919	15.0	4.64
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	7	2.06	18	1	.944	7.5	4.36
26	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	15	2.45	22	1	.955	9.5	5.64
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.80	20	4	.800	7.0	2.45
34	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	9	1.80	15	2.22	37	0	1.000	13.0	5.60
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.96	27	2	.926	13.0	6.61
Total		50	1	34	35	3	0.70	48	0.96	169	2.01	391	46	.882	125.0	4.28