Players

Vincent Donovan 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	11	10	12	9	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	8	19	-.105	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.13
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	12	27	-.259	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.44
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	9	18	-.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.91
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	17	.412	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.69
8	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.22
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	9	33	.061	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.16
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.83
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	15	-.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.28
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	24	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.74
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	21	.048	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.39
15	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	19	-.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.17
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	9	20	-.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.58
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	5	15	-.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.39
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	16	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.80
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	15	-.133	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.99
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	7	24	-.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.78
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	7	31	.032	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.72
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	11	24	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.92
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	7	28	-.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.05
Total		67	84	1.25	120	401	-.090	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	117.5	3.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	12	4.00	NA	NA	15	3	.800	6.5	4.13
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	24	9	.625	6.0	3.44
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	NA	NA	25	5	.800	0.0	1.91
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	23	4	.826	11.5	5.69
8	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	NA	NA	33	7	.788	6.5	3.22
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	13	3.25	NA	NA	39	6	.846	14.0	5.16
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	NA	NA	25	4	.840	15.5	5.83
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	NA	NA	29	3	.897	5.5	3.28
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	30	5	.833	7.5	3.74
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	28	8	.714	4.5	2.39
15	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	21	6	.714	3.5	2.17
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	23	7	.696	1.0	1.58
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	NA	NA	32	8	.750	0.0	2.39
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	NA	NA	25	5	.800	4.0	2.80
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	22	5	.773	4.0	2.99
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	37	4	.892	5.0	3.78
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	11	2.75	NA	NA	31	8	.742	10.5	3.72
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	NA	NA	39	2	.949	6.0	3.92
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	NA	NA	31	7	.774	6.0	3.05
Total		67	1	21	22	4	0.33	122	1.82	0	0.00	532	106	.801	117.5	3.43