Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	21	7.00	69	.304	2.5	3.20
2	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	23	7.67	60	.383	1.0	3.76
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	0	3	0.00	19	.842	44	8.80	107	.411	1.5	4.60
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	0	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	31	10.33	65	.477	1.5	5.02
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	0	4	0.00	9	.556	28	9.33	56	.500	0.5	4.32
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	25	8.33	63	.397	2.5	4.23
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	26	8.67	58	.448	0.5	3.76
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	10	1	3	0.20	22	.864	52	10.40	106	.491	1.0	5.10
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	22	7.33	60	.367	3.0	4.25
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	15	2	5	0.50	27	.815	44	11.00	91	.484	3.5	6.73
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	1	3	0.33	8	.625	27	9.00	72	.375	1.5	3.18
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	47	9.40	90	.522	1.5	4.72
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	30	10.00	62	.484	3.0	5.63
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	8	.000	4	0	6	0.00	17	.647	60	15.00	103	.583	1.0	8.14
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	25	8.33	62	.403	5.0	4.07
Total		53	10	0.19	4	50	.120	70	6	37	0.11	208	.822	505	9.53	1124	.449	29.5	4.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.20
2	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.76
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.60
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.02
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.32
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.23
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.76
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.10
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.25
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.73
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.18
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.72
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.63
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.14
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	6	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.07
Total		53	3	21	24	4	0.45	52	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	29.5	4.71