Players

Dangelo Dudley 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	-	12	12	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	10	-.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.74
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	6	-.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.16
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.54
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.32
8	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.34
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.03
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.68
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	8	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	11	-.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.16
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	8	-.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.77
15	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	12	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.39
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.30
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	19	-.053	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.57
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	4	7	-.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.03
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.60
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	4	6	-.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.57
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	15	.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.35
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	3	6	-.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.88
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	3	12	-.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.29
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.18
Total		70	53	0.76	58	188	-.027	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	96.5	3.90

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.74
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.16
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.54
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.32
8	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.34
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.03
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.68
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.16
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.77
15	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.39
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.30
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.57
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.03
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.60
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.57
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.35
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.88
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.29
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.18
Total		70	5	39	44	5	0.63	20	0.29	.	.	.	.	.	96.5	3.90