Players

Theo Kostas Sophomore Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	12	12	12	10	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	16	-.063	2	1	4	0.33	8	.500	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.16
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	8	30	-.100	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.02
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	9	36	.139	6	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.00
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	27	.185	9	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.75
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	26	.462	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	16.0	7.65
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	2.44
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.79
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	6	26	.308	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.97
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	9	.333	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.45
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.07
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.17
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	9	.556	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	3.13
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	8	.125	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.67
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	14	.143	5	1	0	0.20	13	1.000	1	0.20	1	1.000	8.5	4.24
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.5	4.20
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	13	.308	2	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.53
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	3.83
Total		56	110	1.96	51	279	.211	56	7	26	0.13	160	.838	5	0.09	8	.625	134.5	4.59

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	9	2.28	18	0	1.000	5.5	4.16
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	7	1.75	10	1.93	30	5	.833	8.0	4.02
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	5	2.07	15	1	.933	16.0	7.00
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	13	2.42	19	1	.947	11.5	7.75
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.15	20	1	.950	16.0	7.65
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	16	1.97	33	6	.818	5.5	2.44
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	12	2.24	25	1	.960	5.0	3.79
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.44	18	0	1.000	14.0	7.97
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	1.94	34	3	.912	3.5	2.45
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	5	2.11	9	1	.889	9.5	5.07
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	2.09	11	0	1.000	5.0	3.17
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.77	22	3	.864	7.0	3.13
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	12	2.25	20	3	.850	3.0	3.67
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	6	1.20	16	2.15	33	3	.909	8.5	4.24
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.13	16	0	1.000	4.5	4.20
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	17	2.16	31	4	.871	6.5	3.53
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	11	2.00	23	1	.957	5.5	3.83
Total		56	1	33	34	2	0.61	71	1.27	177	2.11	377	33	.912	134.5	4.59