Players

Career Honors

S12nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.30
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.78
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.30
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.40
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.53
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.43
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.33
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	9.84
13	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.74
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.53
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.12
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.80
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.25
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.70
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.13
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.23
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	9.90
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.40
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.68
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.39
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.44

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	NA	NA	22	2	.909	0.0	5.30
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	NA	NA	19	1	.947	0.0	6.78
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	NA	NA	18	2	.889	0.0	4.30
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	20	5	.750	0.0	3.40
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	18	2	.889	1.0	5.53
9	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	1.0	8.43
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	26	4	.846	0.0	5.33
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	NA	NA	24	0	1.000	0.0	9.84
13	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	NA	NA	32	5	.844	2.0	6.74
14	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	22	2	.909	0.0	6.53
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	NA	NA	24	3	.875	0.0	6.12
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	NA	NA	21	3	.857	0.0	2.80
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	NA	NA	26	2	.923	1.0	6.25
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	NA	NA	32	3	.906	0.0	5.70
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	23	1	.957	2.0	8.13
26	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	NA	NA	31	2	.935	0.0	7.23
27	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	NA	NA	30	1	.967	0.0	9.90
30	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	NA	NA	23	0	1.000	2.0	5.40
31	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	NA	NA	33	2	.939	0.0	7.68
33	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	24	0	1.000	0.0	7.39
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	185	2.64	0	0.00	483	40	.917	9.0	6.44