Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	11	1	1	0.25	21	.952	41	10.25	98	.418	3.5	7.22
3	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	7	1	4	0.25	17	.765	31	7.75	81	.383	2.5	4.41
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	29	9.67	78	.372	1.5	5.04
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	9	.444	3	1	5	0.25	15	.667	43	10.75	102	.422	7.0	6.12
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	29	9.67	78	.372	1.5	4.82
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	1	3	0.25	15	.800	44	11.00	89	.494	1.5	5.63
15	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	34	11.33	79	.430	1.0	6.07
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	18	6.00	60	.300	0.5	1.50
Total		28	7	0.25	2	36	.139	33	4	18	0.14	95	.811	269	9.61	665	.405	19.0	5.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.22
3	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.41
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.04
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.12
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.82
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.63
15	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.07
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.50
Total		28	2	12	14	2	0.50	37	1.32	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	5.10