Players

Luke Martin 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	11	15	12	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	26	.192	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.09
3	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	27	.074	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.75
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	20	.050	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	3.02
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	28	.071	11	1	1	0.20	23	.957	2	0.40	2	1.000	9.5	5.03
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	21	-.095	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	0	0.00	2	.000	6.0	4.46
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	24	.250	8	2	4	0.50	17	.765	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	7.64
18	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	27	.222	8	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.96
19	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	7	29	.034	6	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.77
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	12	.083	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	4.49
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	14	.500	5	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.03
29	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	12	.417	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	1	0.20	1	1.000	8.5	3.15
30	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	2	.500	9.5	5.22
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	2	.500	7.5	6.21
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	19	.263	6	1	4	0.33	14	.714	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.06
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	9	24	.000	5	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	3	0.60	2	1.500	12.5	6.02
37	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	17	.471	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	0	0.00	2	.000	12.5	4.86
39	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	5	1.000	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	5.33
42	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	15	.467	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.93
44	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	11	.273	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.93
Total		70	149	2.13	77	355	.203	96	12	38	0.17	246	.846	11	0.16	18	.611	190.0	5.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	10.0	7.09
3	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	12	2.30	20	1	.950	10.5	5.75
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	7	1.89	18	3	.833	6.0	3.02
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	14	2.38	24	0	1.000	9.5	5.03
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.23	13	1	.923	6.0	4.46
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	12	3.00	18	2.48	29	1	.966	15.0	7.64
18	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	13	3.25	15	2.32	25	2	.920	15.5	7.96
19	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	25	2.45	40	0	1.000	10.5	5.77
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	12	2.28	25	1	.960	5.0	4.49
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	9.5	7.03
29	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	14	2.00	32	3	.906	8.5	3.15
30	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.16	19	2	.895	9.5	5.22
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	12	4.00	12	2.56	16	1	.938	7.5	6.21
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	11	2.29	24	1	.958	13.0	8.06
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	13	2.60	13	2.60	20	0	1.000	12.5	6.02
37	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	14	2.20	35	1	.971	12.5	4.86
39	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	1	2.67	5	1.67	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	10.0	5.33
42	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	19	2.38	29	1	.966	11.0	5.93
44	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	15	2.27	26	2	.923	8.0	5.93
Total		70	2	54	56	2	0.80	135	1.93	247	2.32	438	20	.954	190.0	5.73