Players

Luke Martin 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	11	15	12	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	20	.450	8	4	2	1.33	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	8.34
4	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	19	.263	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.0	7.09
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	6	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.07
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.77
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	13	.308	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	2	.500	7.5	5.39
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	32	.250	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	6.81
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	15	-.067	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	4.06
18	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	16	.188	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	4.96
20	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	17	.176	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	6.69
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	17	.294	6	2	3	0.50	14	.786	1	0.25	2	.500	9.5	5.04
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.0	5.37
33	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.88
37	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	8	.625	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.79
39	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	20	.350	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.03
42	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	16	.500	7	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.80
44	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	12	.583	3	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.71
Total		55	129	2.35	48	262	.309	68	16	29	0.29	196	.852	9	0.16	11	.818	162.5	5.49

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	12	4.00	4	2.00	10	0	1.000	17.5	8.34
4	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.53	17	0	1.000	10.0	7.09
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	4	1.91	11	1	.909	7.5	4.07
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.36	25	2	.920	13.0	7.77
13	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	8	3.00	8	0	1.000	7.5	5.39
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	14	3.50	7	1.94	18	2	.889	14.5	6.81
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.47	15	2	.867	5.5	4.06
18	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	8	2.00	9	2.36	14	1	.929	10.5	4.96
20	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	12	2.56	16	0	1.000	9.5	6.69
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	13	2.55	20	0	1.000	9.5	5.04
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	12	2.40	20	0	1.000	8.0	5.37
33	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	7	2.27	15	0	1.000	6.0	3.88
37	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	12	2.35	20	1	.950	8.0	4.79
39	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	3	0.75	13	1.85	33	4	.879	13.0	5.03
42	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	18	2.10	40	4	.900	11.5	4.80
44	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	15	2.06	32	3	.906	11.0	3.71
Total		55	1	33	34	3	0.62	90	1.64	171	2.24	314	20	.936	162.5	5.49