Players

Angel Bridges 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	15	14	15	7

Career Honors

S32nd All-SEC

S41st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	24	.208	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	2	0.50	1	2.000	10.0	4.90
3	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	5	3	1	1.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.69
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	23	.391	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	7.50
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	10	25	-.160	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	2	0.50	1	2.000	8.5	3.95
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	23	.478	7	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.55
14	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	27	.481	7	1	5	0.20	21	.762	1	0.20	1	1.000	20.5	7.76
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	6.99
19	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	29	.310	11	2	2	0.50	23	.913	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.02
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	3	22	.636	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.48
23	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	32	.344	7	2	4	0.40	21	.810	1	0.20	1	1.000	18.5	7.27
25	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	17	.235	8	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.45
27	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	21	.286	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.35
28	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	22	.364	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.26
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	26	.385	2	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.13
33	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	16	.063	11	3	1	1.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.30
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	28	.643	1	1	2	0.25	10	.800	2	0.50	2	1.000	22.0	7.80
36	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	20	.450	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.99
37	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	26	.385	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.5	6.87
42	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	2	24	.708	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	9.20
Total		67	242	3.61	78	440	.373	92	18	41	0.27	260	.842	14	0.21	11	1.273	284.5	7.18

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.19	32	0	1.000	10.0	4.90
3	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	12	2.38	21	0	1.000	16.0	8.69
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	14	2.35	23	1	.957	14.0	7.50
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	14	2.07	28	3	.893	8.5	3.95
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	9	2.16	19	1	.947	16.5	8.55
14	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	9	1.80	20	2.27	41	2	.951	20.5	7.76
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	6	2.00	9	2.12	17	1	.941	10.5	6.99
19	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	9	1.92	26	1	.962	18.5	7.02
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	4	2.17	12	0	1.000	19.5	9.48
23	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	20	2.35	34	1	.971	18.5	7.27
25	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	7	2.00	14	3	.786	9.0	6.45
27	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.10	21	3	.857	9.5	5.35
28	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.13	15	1	.933	12.0	6.26
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	10	2.39	18	0	1.000	17.5	7.13
33	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	12.5	7.30
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	17	2.40	30	1	.967	22.0	7.80
36	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.59	17	0	1.000	13.0	7.99
37	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	15	2.46	24	2	.917	15.5	6.87
42	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	15	2.42	24	1	.958	21.0	9.20
Total		67	2	45	47	4	0.70	82	1.22	227	2.26	430	21	.951	284.5	7.18