Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	20	6.67	62	.323	2.0	2.48
2	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	10	.000	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	47	9.40	121	.388	4.5	5.30
5	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	23	7.67	68	.338	3.5	4.30
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	26	8.67	63	.413	1.0	3.60
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	20	6.67	57	.351	0.0	1.80
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	14	.143	9	3	3	0.60	19	.842	47	9.40	109	.431	8.0	5.43
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	5	.200	3	1	0	0.20	10	1.000	40	8.00	102	.392	4.0	3.70
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	19	6.33	63	.302	0.5	1.66
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	6	0	6	0.00	16	.625	50	10.00	103	.485	3.0	5.61
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	18	6.00	70	.257	1.0	1.78
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	28	9.33	72	.389	0.5	5.06
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	5	2	3	0.50	13	.769	41	10.25	104	.394	6.5	6.40
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	46	11.50	97	.474	1.5	6.56
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	4	-.250	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	40	10.00	86	.465	2.5	5.14
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	21	7.00	61	.344	1.0	2.64
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	38	12.67	76	.500	0.5	7.56
Total		59	17	0.29	14	80	.038	62	10	29	0.17	173	.832	524	8.88	1314	.399	40.0	4.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.48
2	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.30
5	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.30
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.60
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.80
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.43
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.70
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.66
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.61
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.78
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.06
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.40
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.56
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.14
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.64
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.56
Total		59	4	18	22	6	0.37	55	0.93	.	.	.	.	.	40.0	4.31