Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	2	0.67	9	.222	1.0	9.06
2	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	0	0.00	8	.000	0.0	4.70
3	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	6	2.00	4	1.500	0.0	8.74
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	3	0	0.60	13	1.000	3	0.60	7	.429	3.0	4.65
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.50	9	.778	4	1.00	9	.444	2.0	6.78
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	11	.000	0.0	9.01
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.81
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	7.30
18	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	3	0.40	21	.857	4	0.80	12	.333	2.0	10.00
22	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	4	0.40	12	.667	3	0.60	10	.300	2.0	7.58
29	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.50	11	.909	3	0.75	13	.231	2.0	6.50
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	45	12	19	0.28	125	.848	29	0.67	95	.305	12.0	7.47

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	8	2.31	16	0	1.000	1.0	9.06
2	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	7	2.25	16	1	.938	0.0	4.70
3	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	9	2.20	15	2	.867	0.0	8.74
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	9	1.83	23	3	.870	3.0	4.65
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	5	2.18	11	0	1.000	2.0	6.78
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	22	5.50	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	9.01
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.63	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.81
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	7.30
18	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	30	6.00	14	2.58	19	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
22	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	10	2.28	18	1	.944	2.0	7.58
29	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	7	2.36	14	0	1.000	2.0	6.50
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	140	3.26	97	2.30	177	8	.955	12.0	7.47