Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	5.03
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	4.75
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.43
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	14	.143	0.0	4.80
8	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	11	.000	0.0	7.76
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	5.20
11	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	5.30
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	.500	0.0	5.85
16	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.01
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	3.60
20	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	5.60
21	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	4	1.750	0.0	5.09
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	5.93
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	.200	0.0	4.45
28	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.95
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	5.58
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	.600	0.0	5.90
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	5.40
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.50
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.88
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	5.35
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	3.40
Total		84	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	57	0.68	155	.368	0.0	5.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.38	21	1	.952	0.0	5.03
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	7	1.83	18	2	.889	0.0	4.75
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.33	24	2	.917	0.0	6.43
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.00	31	3	.903	0.0	4.80
8	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	2.46	26	1	.962	0.0	7.76
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.00	14	1	.929	0.0	5.20
11	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	8	2.17	18	1	.944	0.0	5.30
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	18	2.58	26	0	1.000	0.0	5.85
16	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	0.0	7.01
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	2.17	12	0	1.000	0.0	3.60
20	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	9	2.24	17	0	1.000	0.0	5.60
21	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	2.17	29	0	1.000	0.0	5.09
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	18	2.41	32	0	1.000	0.0	5.93
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	6	1.94	16	1	.938	0.0	4.45
28	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	2	1.90	10	0	1.000	0.0	3.95
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	9	1.78	23	4	.826	0.0	5.58
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	19	2.24	38	3	.921	0.0	5.90
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.00	27	1	.963	0.0	5.40
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	19	2.22	37	1	.973	0.0	5.50
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	15	2.06	31	3	.903	0.0	5.88
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	2.10	29	3	.897	0.0	5.35
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.00	24	3	.875	0.0	3.40
Total		84	.	.	.	.	.	152	1.81	248	2.17	518	30	.942	0.0	5.35