Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 08:46:11 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jose Valentine 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	17	15	14	15	5

Season 3 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
107 102nd	.000 194th	15 80th	109 69th	49 71st

Career Honors

S62nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	26	-.115	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	2.43
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	10	32	-.063	3	1	2	0.25	10	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	3.44
6	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	17	-.059	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.57
8	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	17	.235	8	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.39
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	18	.056	2	0	6	0.00	11	.455	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.5	3.84
13	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	18	51	-.157	7	2	3	0.50	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.23
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	13	-.077	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	2	0.67	2	1.000	3.5	3.37
17	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	11	26	-.154	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	4.37
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	16	.125	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	3.22
20	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	16	.625	6	1	5	0.25	16	.688	1	0.25	1	1.000	11.5	6.14
23	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	3	15	-.133	2	2	1	0.40	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.89
25	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	25	-.040	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.5	3.81
29	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	38	.053	4	2	3	0.50	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.16
32	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	32	-.031	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.50
33	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	29	.276	6	1	1	0.25	13	.923	1	0.25	2	.500	18.5	7.73
36	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	11	35	-.057	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.72
38	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	25	-.080	10	3	1	0.60	18	.944	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	3.51
Total		62	107	1.73	107	431	.000	61	15	38	0.24	183	.792	9	0.15	14	.643	148.5	4.43

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	1.96	27	4	.852	3.0	2.43
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	17	2.06	33	4	.879	9.5	3.44
6	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	1.90	29	4	.862	5.0	2.57
8	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	10	2.44	16	0	1.000	8.5	5.39
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	13	2.13	30	2	.933	4.5	3.84
13	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	9	2.25	14	2.13	32	2	.938	13.5	6.23
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	12	1.93	29	4	.862	3.5	3.37
17	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	12	1.88	24	6	.750	9.0	4.37
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	9	1.95	19	4	.789	6.5	3.22
20	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	22	2.29	38	2	.947	11.5	6.14
23	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	8	9	0	1.80	7	1.40	15	2.06	34	4	.882	8.0	3.89
25	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	15	2.16	31	3	.903	4.5	3.81
29	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	19	2.24	37	4	.892	14.5	6.16
32	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	6	2.05	20	1	.950	8.5	4.50
33	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	2	7	9	1	2.25	17	4.25	12	2.07	30	1	.967	18.5	7.73
36	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	16	2.15	33	3	.909	10.0	4.72
38	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	4	0.80	13	1.84	31	4	.871	10.0	3.51
Total		62	4	45	49	5	0.79	109	1.76	227	2.08	493	52	.895	148.5	4.43