Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.32
4	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	17	.176	4	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	0	0	1	0.00	3	.667	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.05
6	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	10	.300	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.21
8	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.03
9	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.60
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	15	.600	7	2	3	0.50	15	.800	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.83
15	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	19	.105	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
16	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	17	.235	7	2	1	0.40	14	.929	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	11	.273	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.32
20	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.92
21	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	14	.071	11	2	1	0.50	21	.952	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.45
28	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	12	.167	4	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.34
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.10
32	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.78
33	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	18	.444	13	0	2	0.00	26	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.21
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	5	14	-.071	3	1	2	0.20	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.96
38	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	7	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.68
41	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	5	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.14
43	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	23	.391	9	4	4	1.00	19	.789	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.89
Total		81	134	1.65	49	265	.321	97	19	45	0.23	262	.828	.	.	.	.	196.5	6.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.32
4	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	3	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.05
6	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.21
8	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.03
9	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.60
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.83
15	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	1	10	11	0	2.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
16	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.32
20	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.92
21	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.45
28	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.34
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.10
32	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.78
33	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.21
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.96
38	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.68
41	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.14
43	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.89
Total		81	6	75	81	9	1.00	38	0.47	.	.	.	.	.	196.5	6.12