Players

Rigoberto Torres 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	16	16	-

Season 5 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
238 58th	.493 28th	44 3rd	80 148th	62 92nd

Career Honors

S51st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	6	3	1	1.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.34
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	21	7.00	5	31	.516	15	5	1	1.67	21	.952	.	.	.	.	26.5	7.61
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	26	.192	7	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.89
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	9	.222	7	1	5	0.20	22	.773	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.84
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
9	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	30	.433	14	3	3	0.75	21	.857	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.56
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	13	.923	10	1	1	0.25	21	.952	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.52
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	8	2	3	0.67	13	.769	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.33
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	15	.467	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.90
14	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	32	.406	9	2	3	0.40	20	.850	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.18
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	0	23	.826	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.81
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	20	.350	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.48
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.78
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	17	.647	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	16	.438	9	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.79
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	9	.778	8	4	2	1.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.64
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	7	24	.292	7	1	2	0.20	18	.889	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.36
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	12	.750	9	6	1	2.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.61
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	14	.214	8	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.72
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.63
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.40
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	8	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.20
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	5	1.000	7	3	2	0.75	17	.882	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.87
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	9	3	0	1.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.07
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.30
Total		92	238	2.59	53	375	.493	183	44	50	0.48	400	.875	.	.	.	.	314.0	6.93

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.34
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	26.5	7.61
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.89
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.84
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
9	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.56
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.52
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.33
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.90
14	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.18
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.81
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.48
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.78
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.79
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.64
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.36
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.61
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.72
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.63
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.40
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.20
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.87
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.07
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.30
Total		92	2	60	62	6	0.67	80	0.87	.	.	.	.	.	314.0	6.93