Players

Landry Gamble 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	16	14	-

Season 4 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
160 54th	.337 73rd	22 32nd	48 131st	53 53rd

Career Honors

S42nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	20	.200	7	1	4	0.20	19	.789	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.95
4	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.62
6	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	17	.000	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.34
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	13	.000	6	1	3	0.33	15	.800	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.49
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	1	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.80
10	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	14	.143	9	1	3	0.25	21	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.48
12	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	10	1	2	0.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.15
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	17	.176	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.00
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	13	1	3	0.33	18	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.78
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	10	2	2	0.67	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.89
23	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	13	.154	9	3	3	0.75	21	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.83
24	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	19	.316	11	1	4	0.25	21	.810	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.60
25	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	15	.533	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.66
28	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	16	.188	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.25
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	7	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.28
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	6	.667	6	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.52
34	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	14	.429	7	1	2	0.20	20	.900	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.41
37	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	7	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.97
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	11	.455	4	0	6	0.00	16	.625	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.60
42	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	14	.714	5	2	1	0.50	17	.941	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.25
Total		78	160	2.05	65	282	.337	132	22	49	0.28	327	.850	.	.	.	.	210.0	6.16

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.95
4	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.62
6	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	2	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.34
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.49
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.80
10	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.48
12	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.15
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.00
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.78
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.89
23	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.83
24	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.60
25	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.66
28	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.25
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.28
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.52
34	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.41
37	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.97
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.60
42	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.25
Total		78	3	50	53	11	0.68	48	0.62	.	.	.	.	.	210.0	6.16