Players

Matthew Compton 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	12	10	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	13	-.154	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.05
4	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	11	-.273	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.98
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	15	-.200	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.50
8	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	12	.583	1	1	0	0.25	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.80
12	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	17	.059	5	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	19	.158	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.41
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	13	-.154	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.81
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	9	.222	2	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.64
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	18	.000	2	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.50
24	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	15	.200	6	2	4	0.40	15	.733	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.14
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	12	-.083	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.72
28	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	17	.294	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.86
29	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.66
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.00
33	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	18	.278	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.83
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	20	.000	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
38	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	20	.000	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.38
Total		59	74	1.25	54	260	.077	56	15	30	0.25	171	.825	.	.	.	.	103.5	4.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.05
4	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.98
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.50
8	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.80
12	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.41
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.81
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.64
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.50
24	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.14
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.72
28	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.86
29	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.66
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.00
33	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.83
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.30
38	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.38
Total		59	4	21	25	4	0.42	37	0.63	.	.	.	.	.	103.5	4.53