Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 3 hours and 44 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 02:15:39 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Donavan Salinas 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	15	13	4

Season 1 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
179 42nd	.331 58th	21 39th	136 34th	42 65th

Career Honors

S22nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 1)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	21	.238	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.53
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	24	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.88
4	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	18	.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.17
5	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	22	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.45
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	18	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.48
7	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	21	-.095	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.15
8	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	14	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.89
11	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	21	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.03
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	24	.458	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.59
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	27	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.16
18	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	29	.517	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.14
19	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	19	.211	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.98
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	26	.346	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.46
22	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	5	39	.513	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	27.0	8.57
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	21	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.40
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	20	.550	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.86
31	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	14	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.98
Total		72	179	2.49	54	378	.331	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	222.5	5.45

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 1)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	NA	NA	33	0	1.000	16.0	6.53
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	NA	NA	28	2	.929	13.0	4.88
4	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	NA	NA	38	4	.895	9.0	4.17
5	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	12	2.40	NA	NA	22	1	.955	13.0	5.45
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	NA	NA	16	2	.875	11.5	6.48
7	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	NA	NA	35	5	.857	9.5	3.15
8	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	2	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	29	1	.966	9.0	4.89
11	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	NA	NA	32	4	.875	9.0	3.03
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	NA	NA	24	6	.750	14.0	5.59
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	NA	NA	30	3	.900	14.0	4.16
18	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	13	2.60	NA	NA	29	2	.931	18.5	7.14
19	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	29	6	.793	7.5	2.98
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	NA	NA	28	4	.857	15.0	5.46
22	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	11	2.20	NA	NA	31	2	.935	27.0	8.57
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	NA	NA	31	3	.903	11.0	7.40
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	18	2	.889	15.5	7.86
31	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	NA	NA	26	2	.923	10.0	4.98
Total		72	3	39	42	2	0.58	136	1.89	0	0.00	479	49	.898	222.5	5.45