Players

Tyree Jamison 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	12	11	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	16	.063	14	2	1	0.67	21	.952	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	3.30
3	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	13	.462	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.51
4	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	20	.300	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.52
5	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	16	-.125	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.74
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	27	.444	7	2	1	0.40	20	.950	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.60
12	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	25	.160	7	1	3	0.20	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.5	4.03
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	23	.348	4	0	2	0.00	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	5.82
15	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	18	.222	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.21
17	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	24	.208	8	1	3	0.25	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	5.87
20	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	29	.241	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	2	.000	12.5	5.70
22	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	23	.304	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.25
24	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	14	.214	7	1	4	0.20	17	.765	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	3.79
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	20	.200	10	1	2	0.25	20	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.14
28	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.96
29	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	24	.458	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	7.28
32	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	12	.417	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	1	0.33	2	.500	7.5	2.69
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	14	.214	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.5	3.67
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	21	.238	6	2	1	0.40	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.21
45	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	19	.368	7	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.39
Total		77	161	2.09	63	364	.269	117	17	34	0.22	287	.882	5	0.06	11	.455	203.5	4.83

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	3	1.54	26	3	.885	6.0	3.30
3	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.06	16	4	.750	8.0	3.51
4	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	11	3.67	10	2.26	19	0	1.000	10.5	7.52
5	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	16	2.12	33	3	.909	6.5	3.74
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	12	1.97	31	4	.871	17.0	5.60
12	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	17	1.92	38	4	.895	12.5	4.03
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	15	2.41	27	0	1.000	14.0	5.82
15	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	6	1.50	17	2.28	29	3	.897	9.0	5.21
17	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	10	1.96	25	3	.880	14.0	5.87
20	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	14	2.10	31	2	.935	12.5	5.70
22	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	12	2.04	27	5	.815	13.5	6.25
24	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	16	2.08	37	2	.946	8.5	3.79
25	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	17	2.31	26	3	.885	10.0	5.14
28	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	11	1.89	28	3	.893	5.5	3.96
29	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	13	2.35	20	3	.850	15.0	7.28
32	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	1.68	28	4	.857	7.5	2.69
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	13	2.11	28	4	.857	8.5	3.67
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	20	2.22	37	3	.919	12.0	4.21
45	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	24	2.12	43	7	.837	13.0	4.39
Total		77	3	45	48	4	0.62	95	1.23	258	2.07	549	60	.891	203.5	4.83