Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	6	45	.378	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	26.0	7.77
3	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	26	-.038	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.06
15	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	19	6.33	6	28	.464	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.98
16	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	24	4.80	9	47	.319	12	3	3	0.60	22	.864	.	.	.	.	28.5	8.37
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	33	.212	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.94
36	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	36	.250	8	2	1	0.40	17	.941	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.71
Total		26	99	3.81	39	215	.279	32	8	11	0.31	83	.867	.	.	.	.	115.5	6.81

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	7.77
3	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.06
15	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.98
16	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	28.5	8.37
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.94
36	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.71
Total		26	1	15	16	0	0.62	18	0.69	.	.	.	.	.	115.5	6.81