Players

Wesley Prater 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	17	11	-

Season 3 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
141 77th	.311 48th	19 47th	30 185th	72 20th

Career Honors

S41st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S53rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S62nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	9	.333	4	2	4	0.50	13	.692	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.67
4	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	7	2	2	0.50	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.11
6	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	12	.167	2	1	0	0.25	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.93
7	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	0	12	.583	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.23
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.76
11	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	18	.278	8	3	1	0.60	17	.941	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.91
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.35
13	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	18	.222	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.86
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	4	-.750	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.88
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	18	-.111	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.75
17	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.01
20	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	21	.095	8	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.00
21	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	7	2	3	0.67	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.68
24	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	7	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.29
25	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.17
28	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	0	14	.929	7	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.24
29	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	10	.700	7	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.40
32	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.68
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	5	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.30
36	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	10	1	3	0.33	18	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.49
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	14	.429	16	1	1	0.25	25	.960	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.78
41	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.67
42	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	18	.111	7	1	1	0.20	18	.944	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.65
Total		83	141	1.70	51	289	.311	123	19	38	0.23	278	.863	.	.	.	.	200.0	5.99

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.67
4	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.11
6	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.93
7	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.23
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.76
11	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.91
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.35
13	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	2	1	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.86
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.88
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.75
17	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.01
20	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.00
21	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.68
24	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.29
25	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.17
28	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.24
29	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.40
32	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.68
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.30
36	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.49
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.78
41	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	3	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.67
42	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.65
Total		83	8	64	72	6	0.87	30	0.36	.	.	.	.	.	200.0	5.99