Players

Caleb Hicks 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	14	15	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	15	-.067	4	1	4	0.33	11	.636	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.23
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	10	.500	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.01
6	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	21	.095	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
8	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	13	.385	2	1	3	0.25	9	.667	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.78
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	8	.125	7	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.28
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.29
16	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	18	.611	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
17	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	20	.350	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.24
20	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	13	.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	7	20	.050	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
25	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	16	.313	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.01
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
29	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	17	.059	9	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.18
32	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.03
34	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	20	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.46
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	14	.429	6	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.43
41	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
42	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.06
Total		79	151	1.91	65	300	.287	54	8	23	0.10	140	.836	.	.	.	.	205.5	6.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.23
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	2	5	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.01
6	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
8	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.78
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	2	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.28
13	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.29
16	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
17	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.24
20	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	2	1	3	2	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
25	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.01
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
29	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.18
32	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.03
34	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.46
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.43
41	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
42	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.06
Total		79	13	67	80	12	1.01	11	0.14	.	.	.	.	.	205.5	6.15