Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	4	2	2	0.67	12	.833	19	6.33	73	.260	3.0	2.52
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	21	7.00	66	.318	2.5	4.25
9	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	14	4.67	65	.215	3.5	3.70
12	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	16	5.33	53	.302	0.0	1.08
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	5	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	24	6.00	93	.258	0.5	2.00
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	24	8.00	62	.387	1.0	3.90
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	7	.000	11	1	2	0.20	24	.917	43	8.60	96	.448	3.5	4.73
Total		24	6	0.25	3	33	.091	32	4	7	0.17	86	.919	161	6.71	508	.317	14.0	3.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.52
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.25
9	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.70
12	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.08
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.00
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.90
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.73
Total		24	1	6	7	2	0.29	26	1.08	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	3.17