Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	4	.500	0.0	5.20
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	7.78
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	9	.111	0.0	6.80
9	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	8	.000	0.0	5.30
12	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	4.60
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	3	0.75	4	.750	1.0	8.30
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	3.95
22	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3	0	1.00	20	1.000	2	0.67	9	.222	3.0	6.28
33	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	7.28
41	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	3.60
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.90
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	23	5	7	0.13	60	.883	23	0.58	71	.324	5.0	6.09

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	13	2.03	30	2	.933	0.0	5.20
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	0.0	7.78
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	7	1.79	19	3	.842	0.0	6.80
9	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.17	23	1	.957	0.0	5.30
12	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	1.0	4.60
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	15	2.24	25	1	.960	1.0	8.30
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	22	2.22	36	4	.889	0.0	3.95
22	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	14	2.19	26	3	.885	3.0	6.28
33	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	19	2.32	37	3	.919	0.0	7.28
41	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.05	21	3	.857	0.0	3.60
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	11	2.20	20	2	.900	0.0	7.90
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	91	2.28	137	2.18	263	22	.916	5.0	6.09