Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	13	.077	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	3.32
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	21	.333	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.14
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	16	.250	17	4	1	1.00	23	.957	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.59
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	19	-.053	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.21
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	16	.375	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.09
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.36
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	20	.350	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	4.39
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	18	.222	2	1	4	0.33	8	.500	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.35
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	24	.167	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	2	.500	12.5	7.17
23	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	21	.143	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	2.81
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.38
26	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	17	.647	9	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.65
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	19	.526	5	1	3	0.20	15	.800	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.5	5.72
33	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	7	17	.059	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.58
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	18	.611	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.78
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.55
39	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.34
40	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	11	33	.212	12	2	4	0.40	22	.818	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.58
44	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	17	.118	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
45	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	16	.500	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.43
Total		72	178	2.47	77	353	.286	98	16	35	0.22	248	.859	5	0.07	6	.833	221.0	5.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	20	2.09	44	4	.909	6.5	3.32
4	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	9	1.80	11	2.15	26	1	.962	15.5	5.14
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	13	2.36	22	0	1.000	13.5	5.59
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.29	21	1	.952	4.5	5.21
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	6	1.63	19	4	.789	12.5	5.09
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.81	26	5	.808	4.0	2.36
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.96	26	1	.962	9.0	4.39
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	5	1.67	9	2.13	23	2	.913	12.0	6.35
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	10	2.08	25	0	1.000	12.5	7.17
23	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	11	1.90	31	1	.968	11.0	2.81
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	12	1.92	26	5	.808	8.5	4.38
26	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	12	1.87	31	4	.871	17.0	6.65
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	9	1.80	18	2.25	32	2	.938	14.5	5.72
33	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	15	2.14	29	2	.931	9.0	3.58
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	7	1.96	23	1	.957	13.5	7.78
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	13	2.27	26	0	1.000	6.0	4.55
39	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	8	2.00	23	1	.957	11.5	6.34
40	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	4	0.80	10	1.81	32	3	.906	22.5	6.58
44	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	15	2.43	23	0	1.000	9.0	5.48
45	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	7	2.20	15	0	1.000	8.5	5.43
Total		72	1	52	53	6	0.74	87	1.21	226	2.06	523	37	.929	221.0	5.20