Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	2	1.500	0.0	5.63
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	2.70
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	2.95
12	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.20
15	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	8.11
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	4.95
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	1	0.25	2	.500	2.0	6.98
36	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	8	.000	1.0	4.76
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	4.40
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	3	0.10	29	.897	18	0.58	39	.462	3.0	5.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	1.80	30	5	.833	0.0	5.63
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	9	1.86	28	2	.929	0.0	2.70
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	1.95	20	3	.850	0.0	2.95
12	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.17	23	1	.957	0.0	5.20
15	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	18	2.34	29	2	.931	0.0	8.11
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	1.74	23	5	.783	0.0	4.95
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	17	2.22	32	2	.938	2.0	6.98
36	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	1.68	28	6	.786	1.0	4.76
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.00	20	2	.900	0.0	4.40
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	63	2.03	101	1.98	233	28	.880	3.0	5.08