Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	0	5	0.00	13	.615	43	10.75	84	.512	1.0	5.70
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	6	1	3	0.20	13	.769	51	10.20	104	.490	5.5	6.42
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	8	2	4	0.67	17	.765	51	17.00	91	.560	2.0	8.54
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	3	0	1.00	10	1.000	30	10.00	56	.536	4.5	5.02
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	25	8.33	52	.481	3.5	3.67
12	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	10	.100	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	42	14.00	61	.689	2.0	8.96
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	21	7.00	56	.375	3.0	3.83
37	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	34	11.33	70	.486	3.5	6.98
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	47	11.75	83	.566	3.0	6.68
Total		31	11	0.35	1	46	.217	45	10	17	0.32	106	.840	344	11.10	657	.524	28.0	6.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.70
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.42
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.54
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.02
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.67
12	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.96
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.83
37	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.98
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.68
Total		31	1	12	13	0	0.42	34	1.10	.	.	.	.	.	28.0	6.20