Players

Marco Freeman 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	12	13	13	11	10

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	27	.185	14	5	3	1.25	25	.880	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.24
3	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	19	.263	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.70
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	13	.231	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	3.36
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	15	-.200	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	3	.000	5.0	3.63
10	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	10	46	.217	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	7.23
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	27	.148	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.13
13	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	20	.050	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	5.21
16	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	22	.409	4	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.24
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	14	.143	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.39
21	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	5.82
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	22	.182	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.58
33	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	26	.231	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	12.0	6.69
35	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	8	34	.235	11	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	19.5	8.43
41	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	27	.370	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.87
43	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	9	41	.268	3	1	1	0.25	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	23.0	8.32
Total		51	152	2.98	72	366	.219	70	13	21	0.25	173	.879	5	0.10	13	.385	181.5	5.72

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	18	2.09	34	4	.882	18.0	7.24
3	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	8	1.84	25	2	.920	8.5	4.70
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	1.95	22	3	.864	6.0	3.36
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	15	2.10	31	3	.903	5.0	3.63
10	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	12	3.00	9	1.59	27	7	.741	21.5	7.23
11	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	9	1.80	13	1.65	40	9	.775	12.0	3.13
13	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	10	2.44	16	0	1.000	6.0	5.21
16	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	1.40	15	5	.667	12.0	6.24
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	14	2.22	27	3	.889	7.5	4.39
21	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	7	2.27	15	1	.933	9.0	5.82
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	9	1.95	21	3	.857	7.0	3.58
33	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	1.95	22	3	.864	12.0	6.69
35	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	14	2.16	31	1	.968	19.5	8.43
41	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	7	2.00	18	1	.944	14.5	7.87
43	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	17	2.13	39	3	.923	23.0	8.32
Total		51	1	31	32	2	0.63	105	2.06	166	1.98	383	48	.875	181.5	5.72