Players

Jonathan Tucker 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	12	13	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	15	.133	11	1	4	0.20	19	.789	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.96
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.13
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	18	.000	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.05
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	17	.353	4	1	4	0.33	11	.636	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.96
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.30
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	11	.091	3	2	5	0.50	12	.583	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.46
15	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	15	.200	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.35
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.65
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.79
20	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	16	.375	3	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.56
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	19	.421	5	3	1	0.75	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.73
28	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.48
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	21	.571	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.82
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.31
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	14	.214	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.45
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	21	.143	3	1	2	0.20	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.26
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.26
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.84
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.74
Total		76	134	1.76	63	266	.267	73	9	41	0.12	236	.826	.	.	.	.	173.0	5.27

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	3	1	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.96
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.13
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.05
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	3	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.96
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.30
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	2	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.46
15	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.35
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.65
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.79
20	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.56
22	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
24	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.73
28	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.48
29	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.82
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.31
33	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	2	5	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.45
36	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.26
38	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.26
41	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.84
43	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.74
Total		76	6	48	54	12	0.71	19	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	173.0	5.27