Players

Nathan Douglas 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	17	17	12	-

Career Honors

S62nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S71st All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	17	.588	10	3	4	0.60	20	.800	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.20
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	17	.353	9	0	4	0.00	18	.778	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	21	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.55
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	23	.565	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.77
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	11	3	2	1.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.77
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	16	.563	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.07
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	11	.909	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	15	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.63
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	19	.316	18	3	2	0.75	27	.926	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.67
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	17	.294	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.84
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	17	.529	7	4	1	0.80	18	.944	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.29
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	20	.550	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.76
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	21	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	4.89
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	19	.789	12	5	0	1.25	22	1.000	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.34
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
39	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	22	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.69
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	18	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	13	.385	6	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.64
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	22	.500	4	1	1	0.20	14	.929	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.01
Total		86	253	2.94	66	350	.534	82	20	20	0.23	168	.881	.	.	.	.	326.5	7.59

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.20
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.55
7	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.77
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.77
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.07
15	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	2	8	10	1	3.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	1	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.63
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.67
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.84
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
26	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.29
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.76
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	4.89
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.34
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
39	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.69
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.64
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.01
Total		86	7	93	100	9	1.16	27	0.31	.	.	.	.	.	326.5	7.59