Players

Ashton Wolfe 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	14	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	12	.333	8	2	4	0.40	18	.778	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.88
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	12	.333	5	0	6	0.00	15	.600	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.26
4	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	7	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.27
8	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	15	.133	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.21
9	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	11	.364	10	2	4	0.40	19	.789	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.22
12	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	10	-.300	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.03
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	16	-.125	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.17
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	13	.769	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.04
18	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	15	.200	1	1	3	0.20	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.25
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.52
31	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	19	.474	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.95
34	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	18	.333	6	1	4	0.20	20	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.18
36	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	0	19	.632	9	0	5	0.00	19	.737	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.73
39	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	5	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.15
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	13	.769	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
44	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	14	.500	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.77
46	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	16	-.063	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.55
Total		75	130	1.73	43	249	.349	87	14	51	0.19	241	.788	.	.	.	.	188.5	6.34

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	2	5	7	1	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.88
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.26
4	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	2	1.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.27
8	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.21
9	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.22
12	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.03
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.17
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	6	7	1	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.04
18	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.25
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	4	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.52
31	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.95
34	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.18
36	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	10	10	1	2.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.73
39	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.15
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.89
44	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.77
46	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.55
Total		75	9	71	80	10	1.07	38	0.51	.	.	.	.	.	188.5	6.34