Players

Luis Waters 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	11	9	13	10	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	0	0.00	3	.000	3.0	2.69
2	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	4	20	.000	8	2	4	0.40	19	.789	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.67
5	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	7	19	-.263	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	3.67
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	12	.083	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.50
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	13	-.077	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.71
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	5	17	-.176	4	3	6	0.60	16	.625	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.58
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	3	17	-.059	9	1	5	0.20	20	.750	1	0.20	2	.500	3.5	3.60
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	10	-.200	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	2	.500	2.5	2.26
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	7	24	-.167	12	3	2	0.60	23	.913	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	4.76
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	10	30	-.267	0	0	4	0.00	6	.333	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.08
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	15	.067	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.59
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	19	.000	9	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.31
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	20	.000	5	1	4	0.25	17	.765	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.02
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	3	15	-.067	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	3.44
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	18	.111	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.64
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	14	-.214	10	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.13
37	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	14	.000	7	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	4.20
41	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	19	.158	9	2	3	0.40	18	.833	1	0.20	1	1.000	11.0	3.52
42	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	9	22	-.227	7	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.07
Total		71	65	0.92	91	329	-.079	106	15	53	0.21	267	.801	5	0.07	12	.417	96.0	3.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	19	2.15	33	5	.848	3.0	2.69
2	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	18	3.60	11	1.81	32	5	.844	7.5	3.67
5	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	10	1.91	22	3	.864	5.0	3.67
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.43	23	8	.652	2.0	2.50
12	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.14	21	2	.905	4.0	2.71
13	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	15	1.90	31	6	.806	5.0	2.58
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	17	1.97	35	6	.829	3.5	3.60
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	1.63	32	8	.750	2.5	2.26
20	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	10	2.00	14	2.07	27	3	.889	8.0	4.76
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	12	2.00	29	1	.966	2.5	3.08
24	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	16	1.97	31	6	.806	5.5	3.59
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	1.97	31	4	.871	5.0	3.31
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	8	1.48	31	6	.806	9.0	3.02
32	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	11	2.75	13	1.76	34	7	.794	3.0	3.44
33	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	9	1.66	29	5	.828	4.5	2.64
36	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	11	3.67	11	2.20	20	3	.850	3.0	5.13
37	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	10	2.04	25	3	.880	5.0	4.20
41	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	11	2.20	12	1.83	35	4	.886	11.0	3.52
42	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	7	1.75	10	1.88	34	4	.882	7.0	4.07
Total		71	2	28	30	3	0.42	142	2.00	230	1.88	555	89	.840	96.0	3.39