Players

Theodore Harrell 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	15	15	16	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	9	.222	4	2	6	0.50	13	.538	0	0.00	2	.000	6.5	3.83
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	25	.120	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.0	3.41
10	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	21	.286	5	2	3	0.50	14	.786	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.99
11	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	24	.250	11	4	4	1.00	23	.826	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.09
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	16	.125	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.71
16	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	19	.053	8	2	4	0.50	19	.789	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.41
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.30
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	15	.133	9	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.47
23	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	22	.591	4	1	3	0.20	14	.786	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.59
25	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	19	.211	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.02
29	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	16	.438	8	0	5	0.00	16	.688	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.57
32	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	14	.214	12	3	1	0.75	20	.950	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	4.42
33	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	24	.292	4	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.61
36	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	23	.391	4	0	1	0.00	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	5.66
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.83
43	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	12	.250	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	7.0	4.09
Total		64	125	1.95	49	281	.270	84	18	40	0.28	235	.830	9	0.14	6	1.500	170.0	4.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	13	1.96	25	4	.840	6.5	3.83
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	12	1.93	30	4	.867	10.0	3.41
10	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	6	1.81	21	2	.905	11.0	3.99
11	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	7	1.61	28	4	.857	15.5	5.09
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.24	21	1	.952	6.0	3.71
16	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	5	1.25	11	2.00	23	2	.913	11.0	4.41
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	13	2.12	26	3	.885	8.5	4.30
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	12	3.00	11	2.17	23	2	.913	10.5	5.47
23	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	19	2.29	31	2	.935	17.0	6.59
25	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	14	2.03	32	2	.938	10.0	4.02
29	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	10	2.10	21	2	.905	12.0	5.57
32	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.16	25	2	.920	9.0	4.42
33	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	21	2.05	44	1	.977	14.5	4.61
36	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	2.24	25	1	.960	11.0	5.66
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	12	2.22	23	3	.870	10.5	4.83
43	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	18	2.18	40	3	.925	7.0	4.09
Total		64	5	44	49	1	0.77	89	1.39	208	2.07	438	38	.913	170.0	4.63