Players

William Lam 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	15	17	17

Season 6 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
983 10th	64 257th	33 14th	82 137th	57 111th

Career Honors

S5Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S6Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	7	3	0	1.00	15	1.000	38	12.67	60	.633	5.0	8.66
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	38	12.67	48	.792	5.0	9.64
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	38	12.67	68	.559	3.5	7.80
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	38	12.67	65	.585	5.0	8.96
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	31	10.33	61	.508	3.5	6.98
9	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	37	12.33	53	.698	4.5	7.68
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	10	.600	5	4	2	1.33	11	.818	34	11.33	65	.523	12.0	8.14
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	8	0	4	0.00	15	.733	43	14.33	69	.623	2.0	9.38
13	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	3	1	1	0.20	17	.941	59	11.80	82	.720	3.0	6.14
16	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	7	.286	5	1	2	0.20	19	.895	62	12.40	95	.653	4.0	6.90
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	38	12.67	61	.623	3.5	9.38
20	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	34	11.33	59	.576	5.5	7.77
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	7	3	2	1.00	15	.867	35	11.67	55	.636	8.0	7.64
23	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	7	2	3	0.67	14	.786	38	12.67	48	.792	7.5	9.55
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	42	14.00	57	.737	2.0	9.53
27	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	5	.800	7	1	3	0.20	19	.842	62	12.40	83	.747	7.5	9.16
30	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	9	.444	12	5	1	1.25	22	.955	48	12.00	74	.649	9.5	7.95
32	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	8	4	4	0.80	23	.826	62	12.40	106	.585	8.5	8.36
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	8	.500	7	2	2	0.67	13	.846	37	12.33	50	.740	8.0	9.20
39	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	6	.833	3	0	2	0.00	16	.875	61	12.20	95	.642	8.5	8.13
40	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	1	10	.500	11	1	3	0.20	24	.875	67	13.40	89	.753	7.5	9.35
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	41	13.67	61	.672	4.0	8.83
Total		79	64	0.81	8	122	.459	134	33	44	0.42	326	.865	983	12.44	1504	.654	127.5	8.42

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.66
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.64
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.80
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.96
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.98
9	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.68
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.14
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.38
13	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.14
16	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.90
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.38
20	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.77
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.64
23	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	2	2.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.55
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.53
27	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.16
30	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.95
32	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.36
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	9.20
39	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.13
40	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.35
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.83
Total		79	4	53	57	6	0.72	82	1.04	.	.	.	.	.	127.5	8.42