Players

William Lam 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	15	17	17

Season 7 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
971 11th	60 262nd	40 8th	90 105th	47 160th

Career Honors

S5Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S6Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	31	10.33	55	.564	4.0	5.75
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	7	.429	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	49	12.25	92	.533	4.0	8.32
4	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	7	5	3	1.00	20	.850	57	11.40	94	.606	10.0	7.27
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	38	12.67	63	.603	1.5	8.12
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	7	4	1	1.33	13	.923	32	10.67	55	.582	12.5	7.24
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	8	.125	4	1	1	0.20	16	.938	53	10.60	87	.609	4.0	5.84
10	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	6	2	3	0.67	12	.750	33	11.00	46	.717	6.0	6.59
12	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	5	.800	6	1	2	0.25	15	.867	53	13.25	80	.663	6.0	9.20
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	11	2	1	0.67	18	.944	40	13.33	54	.741	4.5	9.27
16	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	9	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	39	13.00	57	.684	2.5	9.31
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	40	13.33	51	.784	5.0	9.18
20	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	9	.556	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	46	11.50	69	.667	7.5	6.34
23	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	6	.833	6	2	0	0.40	16	1.000	52	10.40	92	.565	8.0	6.58
24	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	2	1	0.67	15	.933	31	10.33	53	.585	5.0	6.45
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	9	3	2	0.75	19	.895	55	13.75	85	.647	7.0	9.72
28	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	7	.429	6	4	1	1.00	17	.941	56	14.00	85	.659	8.5	9.32
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	5	.800	4	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	46	11.50	90	.511	6.5	6.88
32	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	16	7	4	2.33	23	.826	39	13.00	56	.696	10.5	9.11
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	9	1	2	0.33	17	.882	37	12.33	56	.661	3.0	9.31
37	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	4	.750	13	2	1	0.40	27	.963	62	12.40	96	.646	5.5	8.34
39	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	52	13.00	68	.765	2.5	8.16
42	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	30	10.00	56	.536	1.0	3.72
Total		81	60	0.74	6	101	.535	137	40	33	0.49	328	.899	971	11.99	1540	.631	125.0	7.73

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.75
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.32
4	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.27
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.12
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.24
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.84
10	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.59
12	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.20
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.27
16	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.31
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.18
20	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.34
23	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	12	2.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.58
24	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.45
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.72
28	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	9.32
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.88
32	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	9.11
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.31
37	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.34
39	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.16
42	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.72
Total		81	3	44	47	3	0.58	90	1.11	.	.	.	.	.	125.0	7.73