Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 04:59:46 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Timothy Shepherd 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	-	-	16	15

Season 4 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
125 30th	2.21 38th	.944 30th	35 58th	11 123rd

Career Honors

S62nd All-SEC

S71st All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	6	0.00	10	.400	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.05
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	1	0.67	16	.938	1	0.33	10	.100	2.0	7.74
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.95
10	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	4	0.50	14	.714	2	0.50	8	.250	2.0	6.73
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	2.50
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	3	3	1.00	8	.625	3	1.00	3	1.000	3.0	6.55
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	7.13
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	7.61
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	3	0.75	5	.600	2.0	8.77
23	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	5.15
25	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.25	9	.889	2	0.50	14	.143	1.0	6.30
29	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	9.34
33	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	20	.900	6	1.20	9	.667	1.0	6.68
Total		49	.	.	.	.	.	57	11	20	0.22	150	.867	35	0.71	89	.393	11.0	6.65

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.30	23	1	.957	0.0	6.05
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	4	1.93	15	1	.933	2.0	7.74
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.14	28	3	.893	0.0	5.95
10	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	9	2.05	19	1	.947	2.0	6.73
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	1.94	16	1	.938	0.0	2.50
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.31	13	1	.923	3.0	6.55
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.20	10	2	.800	0.0	7.13
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	2	2.00	9	0	1.000	0.0	7.61
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	19	4.75	8	2.28	18	0	1.000	2.0	8.77
23	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.17	29	2	.931	0.0	5.15
25	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	2.32	19	1	.947	1.0	6.30
29	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	9.34
33	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	18	2.31	32	1	.969	1.0	6.68
Total		49	.	.	.	.	.	125	2.55	124	2.21	248	14	.944	11.0	6.65