Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	8	.125	4	1	4	0.25	15	.733	45	11.25	104	.433	3.0	6.06
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	21	7.00	61	.344	1.0	3.20
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	27	9.00	69	.391	2.0	3.64
15	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	5	2	4	0.40	18	.778	44	8.80	98	.449	4.5	4.78
18	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	8	.000	7	2	3	0.50	18	.833	43	10.75	90	.478	4.0	6.25
Total		19	6	0.32	3	26	.115	25	6	12	0.32	74	.838	180	9.47	422	.427	14.5	4.79

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.06
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.20
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.64
15	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.78
18	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.25
Total		19	0	5	5	3	0.26	22	1.16	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.79