Players

Lorenzo Gardini 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	12	14	12	12	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.96
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	19	6	3	2.00	24	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.51
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	20	.200	9	1	3	0.20	20	.850	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.53
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	9	0	5	0.00	17	.706	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.66
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	17	-.059	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.43
14	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	15	.600	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.55
19	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	22	.318	9	4	3	1.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.26
20	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	11	.636	7	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.39
22	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	10	.200	11	1	1	0.33	18	.944	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.89
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.73
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	21	.095	2	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.08
26	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	24	.333	7	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.37
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	10	.500	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.13
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	15	.267	9	0	1	0.00	22	.955	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.57
34	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.44
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	18	.333	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.79
Total		57	121	2.12	45	243	.313	109	17	29	0.30	241	.880	.	.	.	.	164.5	5.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.17	12	1	.917	8.0	4.96
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	6	2.75	8	0	1.000	12.5	6.51
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	2	0.40	21	2.27	37	2	.946	12.0	4.53
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	4	2.00	8	2	.750	7.5	5.66
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	8	1.81	21	3	.857	6.5	2.43
14	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	15	1.88	40	3	.925	12.5	4.55
19	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	12	1.94	32	3	.906	16.5	5.26
20	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	18	2.39	28	2	.929	7.5	6.39
22	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	8	2.00	18	3	.833	7.5	4.89
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	8	2.29	14	1	.929	12.5	7.73
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	13	2.21	24	0	1.000	9.5	4.08
26	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	13	2.00	30	3	.900	14.5	6.37
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.22	27	2	.926	6.0	4.13
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	1	1.40	3	0.60	15	2.21	33	1	.970	10.0	4.57
34	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	14	2.41	22	1	.955	10.5	5.44
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	9	1.88	25	2	.920	11.0	4.79
Total		57	3	47	50	4	0.88	72	1.26	185	2.12	379	29	.923	164.5	5.14