Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 09:11:32 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

William Dorsey 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	19	10	-

Season 5 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
119 189th	.283 174th	0 460th	1 485th	46 172nd

Career Honors

S72nd All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	12	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.72
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	9	25	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	14	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
15	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	22	.409	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.98
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	17	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	21	.524	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.86
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.09
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.28
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
34	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	20	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.40
39	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	20	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
Total		50	119	2.38	56	223	.283	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	143.5	5.58

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.72
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	2	3	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
15	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.98
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.86
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.09
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	11	11	0	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.28
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
34	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.40
39	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
Total		50	3	43	46	4	0.92	1	0.02	.	.	.	.	.	143.5	5.58