Players

Gabriel Williamson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	15	16	15	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	20	.300	7	2	1	0.40	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.63
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	31	.226	0	0	4	0.00	9	.556	1	0.25	3	.333	14.5	5.29
4	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	19	.158	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.85
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.84
9	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	6	23	.000	3	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.69
10	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	17	.471	5	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.83
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	19	.526	1	0	3	0.00	5	.400	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.83
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	8	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.59
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	22	.091	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	2.67
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	25	.440	5	1	3	0.25	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	6.90
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	19	.316	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.15
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	9	29	.207	2	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.36
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	20	.150	8	4	2	1.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.35
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	4	12	-.167	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.50
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.60
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	26	.269	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.68
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	8	32	.188	9	4	2	0.80	19	.895	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.40
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	34	.382	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	7.98
Total		66	164	2.48	72	384	.240	78	18	37	0.27	219	.831	10	0.15	6	1.667	212.0	5.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	11	1.93	27	3	.889	11.0	3.63
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	5	1.25	12	1.88	32	5	.844	14.5	5.29
4	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	8	1.70	23	5	.783	9.5	3.85
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	6	2.00	6	2.00	13	2	.846	7.5	4.84
9	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	6	1.20	10	2.04	26	3	.885	9.0	3.69
10	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	15	2.03	33	5	.848	14.5	5.83
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	15.0	8.83
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	14	2.52	21	1	.952	7.5	6.59
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	1.96	24	2	.917	6.5	2.67
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	2.29	17	1	.941	15.0	6.90
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	7	2.33	11	2.26	19	2	.895	11.5	7.15
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	10	2.50	8	1.87	23	3	.870	17.0	6.36
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	8	1.93	15	3	.800	12.5	5.35
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	21	2.30	40	3	.925	4.0	4.50
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	8	2.15	20	1	.950	7.5	3.60
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	10	1.96	24	3	.875	11.0	6.68
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	9	1.80	20	2.15	40	3	.925	19.5	6.40
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	15	2.09	32	3	.906	19.0	7.98
Total		66	2	56	58	5	0.88	98	1.48	205	2.08	444	48	.892	212.0	5.56