Players

Gabriel Williamson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	15	16	15	7

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
251 48th	.336 138th	25 53rd	108 58th	79 32nd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	17	.235	11	0	3	0.00	20	.850	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	5.08
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	21	.238	9	2	2	0.50	19	.895	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.24
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	9	.111	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.82
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	26	.385	15	3	4	0.60	27	.852	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	4.87
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	18	.333	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.34
9	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	11	41	.098	9	3	1	0.60	19	.947	.	.	.	.	20.0	5.95
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	8	.500	9	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.82
11	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	25	.480	8	1	0	0.20	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.91
13	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	18	.222	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	3.10
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	5	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	4.19
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	21	.524	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.00
18	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	25	.360	8	4	0	1.00	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.59
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	9	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.99
20	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	19	-.053	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.39
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	8	32	.188	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.5	5.54
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.37
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	15	.333	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.38
26	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	17	.647	4	0	4	0.00	16	.750	1	0.25	2	.500	16.5	7.02
27	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	16	.375	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.82
30	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	19	.421	6	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.95
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	11	.909	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.63
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.08
37	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	25	.240	4	1	5	0.20	14	.643	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	3.81
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	18	.389	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	6.09
40	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	20	.350	11	3	4	0.60	23	.826	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.0	3.38
42	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	4.44
45	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.71
47	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	18	.389	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.07
Total		108	251	2.32	84	497	.336	156	25	50	0.23	400	.875	12	0.11	13	.923	317.0	5.16

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	20	2.24	33	5	.848	9.0	5.08
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	12	2.15	27	2	.926	14.0	6.24
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	2.05	22	2	.909	5.0	3.82
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	13	1.79	28	7	.750	17.0	4.87
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	10	1.96	26	1	.962	8.0	5.34
9	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	6	1.20	12	1.90	29	4	.862	20.0	5.95
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	23	2.44	34	3	.912	8.5	4.82
11	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	15	2.17	30	3	.900	16.5	5.91
13	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	16	2.27	33	0	1.000	9.0	3.10
14	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.31	13	1	.923	5.0	4.19
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	5	1.67	7	2.06	17	1	.941	17.0	8.00
18	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	16	2.09	34	3	.912	18.0	6.59
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.29	17	0	1.000	8.0	5.99
20	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	11	1.94	32	2	.938	7.0	3.39
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	8	1.60	8	1.83	24	1	.958	17.5	5.54
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	9	2.75	12	0	1.000	8.5	5.37
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	20	2.63	27	1	.963	11.0	5.38
26	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	.	.	15	2.23	30	2	.933	16.5	7.02
27	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	22	2.26	39	4	.897	10.5	3.82
30	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	10	2.09	23	1	.957	15.0	7.95
32	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.27	26	2	.923	10.0	6.63
34	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	9	2.05	21	2	.905	6.5	4.08
37	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	19	2.10	42	4	.905	12.0	3.81
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	7	2.25	16	0	1.000	10.0	6.09
40	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	21	1.96	48	6	.875	12.0	3.38
42	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	3	1.00	8	2.13	16	2	.875	9.5	4.44
45	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	16	2.28	29	2	.931	6.5	4.71
47	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	14	1.92	38	3	.921	9.5	3.07
Total		108	3	76	79	3	0.73	108	1.00	375	2.14	766	64	.916	317.0	5.16