Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	13	.000	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.28
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	15	.000	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.19
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	22	.136	8	3	2	0.60	19	.895	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.25
11	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	21	-.048	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.48
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	20	-.050	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.58
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	5	13	-.231	2	1	4	0.25	9	.556	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.12
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	13	.000	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.06
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	6	19	-.053	6	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.58
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	15	.133	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.44
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
Total		40	46	1.15	39	164	.043	38	8	20	0.20	121	.835	.	.	.	.	66.0	4.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.28
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.19
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.25
11	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.48
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.58
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.12
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.06
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.58
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.44
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
Total		40	3	18	21	2	0.53	30	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	66.0	4.69