Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	10	.200	9	1	4	0.20	22	.818	56	11.20	96	.583	6.0	7.04
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	5	-.400	6	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	28	9.33	74	.378	0.0	4.90
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	3	1	5	0.25	14	.643	45	11.25	78	.577	4.5	6.73
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	7	3	1	1.00	13	.923	33	11.00	55	.600	5.5	6.58
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	8	0	4	0.00	14	.714	28	9.33	56	.500	4.5	6.98
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	7	2	4	0.67	16	.750	37	12.33	67	.552	5.0	8.55
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	31	10.33	69	.449	2.5	5.79
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	38	12.67	69	.551	3.0	9.24
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	13	.308	2	1	4	0.20	17	.765	61	12.20	92	.663	10.0	7.96
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	12	4	0	1.00	24	1.000	47	11.75	84	.560	6.5	7.71
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	52	13.00	90	.578	3.0	8.44
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	7	2	2	0.67	16	.875	33	11.00	47	.702	6.5	6.94
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	27	9.00	57	.474	1.0	4.62
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	4	.750	10	2	3	0.40	21	.857	50	10.00	102	.490	6.5	6.10
Total		51	25	0.49	6	73	.260	95	19	36	0.37	225	.840	566	11.10	1036	.546	64.5	6.97

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.04
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.90
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.73
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.58
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.98
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.55
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.79
17	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.24
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.96
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.71
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.44
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.94
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.62
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.10
Total		51	2	37	39	0	0.76	47	0.92	.	.	.	.	.	64.5	6.97