Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 5 hours and 52 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 12:07:25 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jaiden Zimmerman 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	15	-	-	14	15

Season 5 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
71 175th	2.02 173rd	.896 158th	40 103rd	4 359th

Career Honors

S72nd All-BIG-EAST

S82nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.25	10	.700	5	1.25	3	1.667	1.0	5.15
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	5.98
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.40	18	.833	1	0.20	14	.071	2.0	3.68
11	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	8	.500	0.0	4.50
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.95
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	9	.222	0.0	4.35
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	3.93
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	7	1.40	8	.875	0.0	6.10
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	4.95
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	1	3.000	0.0	3.60
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	1.200	0.0	3.31
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.25	10	1.000	3	0.75	8	.375	1.0	7.53
Total		44	.	.	.	.	.	16	4	10	0.09	62	.839	40	0.91	78	.513	4.0	4.67

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	9	1.83	30	4	.867	1.0	5.15
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	13	1.97	33	5	.848	0.0	5.98
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	13	2.08	25	4	.840	2.0	3.68
11	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	2.25	24	0	1.000	0.0	4.50
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	1.93	29	6	.793	0.0	2.95
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	1.93	28	4	.857	0.0	4.35
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.71	24	3	.875	0.0	3.93
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	17	2.18	34	3	.912	0.0	6.10
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	1.94	18	2	.889	0.0	4.95
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.96	23	2	.913	0.0	3.60
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.91	22	0	1.000	0.0	3.31
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.46	28	0	1.000	1.0	7.53
Total		44	.	.	.	.	.	71	1.61	136	2.02	318	33	.896	4.0	4.67