Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	25	8.33	66	.379	3.0	3.34
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	1	0	5	0.00	10	.500	41	10.25	85	.482	1.5	5.12
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	1	1.000	3	1	2	0.20	12	.833	58	11.60	109	.532	3.0	6.26
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	31	10.33	64	.484	1.5	4.86
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	26	8.67	66	.394	0.5	3.46
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	9	.111	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	51	12.75	76	.671	4.0	8.26
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	26	8.67	64	.406	1.5	4.62
34	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	47	11.75	92	.511	2.0	6.66
39	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	48	12.00	83	.578	3.0	7.74
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	64	12.80	113	.566	1.0	6.42
Total		38	10	0.26	2	39	.205	21	2	16	0.05	92	.826	417	10.97	818	.510	21.0	5.67

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.34
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.12
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.26
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.86
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.46
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.26
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.62
34	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.66
39	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.74
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.42
Total		38	0	18	18	0	0.47	34	0.89	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	5.67