Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	5	0.00	11	.545	6	1.20	5	1.200	0.0	5.70
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	6.00
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	4	1.00	8	.500	1.0	6.63
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	6.65
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	2	1	0.50	23	.957	2	0.50	9	.222	2.0	10.00
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.95
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	3.85
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	7	.143	0.0	4.25
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	13	.077	0.0	6.50
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	4.33
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	36	4	6	0.11	73	.918	20	0.53	58	.345	4.0	6.09

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	9	2.00	21	1	.952	0.0	5.70
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.20	15	0	1.000	1.0	6.00
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	2.31	16	0	1.000	1.0	6.63
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.37	19	1	.947	0.0	6.65
21	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	12	2.47	19	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	2.50	24	1	.958	0.0	6.95
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.09	23	2	.913	0.0	3.85
35	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	2.12	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.25
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.42	26	0	1.000	0.0	6.50
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.25	16	0	1.000	0.0	4.33
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	76	2.00	102	2.28	196	5	.974	4.0	6.09